Gálatas 3:21 in 51 traduzioni
فهل الناموس ضد مواعيد الله. حاشا. لانه لو أعطي ناموس قادر ان يحيي لكان بالحقيقة البر بالناموس.
Tedy zákon jest proti slibům Božím? Odstup to. Nebo kdyby byl zákon dán, kterýž by mohl obživiti, jistě z zákona byla by spravedlnost.
Er da Loven imod Guds Forjættelser? Det være langtfra! Ja, hvis der var givet en Lov, som kunde levendegøre, da var Retfærdigheden virkelig af Lov.
Ist denn das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das lebendig zu machen vermöchte, dann wäre wirklich die Gerechtigkeit aus Gesetz.
Ist denn das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben worden wäre, das lebendig zu machen vermöchte, dann wäre wirklich die Gerechtigkeit aus Gesetz.
Erkennen müssen sie, daß du der alleinige Herr Gott bist und herrlich über den ganzen Erdkreis hin!«
Ist nun das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Das sei ferne! Denn wenn ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das Leben schaffen könnte, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wirklich aus dem Gesetz.
Ist also das Gesetz wider die Verheißungen Gottes? Nimmermehr. Ja, wenn das Gesetz gegeben wäre, mit dem Vermögen Leben zu schaffen, so wäre in Wirklichkeit die Gerechtigkeit aus dem Gesetz.
Ο νομος λοιπον εναντιος των επαγγελιων του Θεου ειναι; Μη γενοιτο. Διοτι εαν ηθελε δοθη νομος δυναμενος να ζωοποιηση, η δικαιοσυνη ηθελεν εισθαι τωοντι εκ του νομου·
Ο νόμος λοιπόν εναντίος των επαγγελιών του Θεού είναι; Μη γένοιτο. Διότι εάν ήθελε δοθή νόμος δυνάμενος να ζωοποιήση, η δικαιοσύνη ήθελεν είσθαι τωόντι εκ του νόμου·
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.
Is the law then against the words of God? in no way; because if there had been a law which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
And when his own had heard of it, they went out to take hold of him. For they said: “Because he has gone mad.”
[Is] then the law against the promises ofGod? Far be the thought. For if a law had been given able to quicken, then indeed righteousness were on the principle of law;
And when his friends had heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him. For they said: He is become mad.
Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.
{Is} the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
[Is] the law then against the promises of God? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could give life, verily righteousness would have been by the law.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
the law, then, is against the promises of God? --let it not be! for if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly by law there would have been the righteousness,
CXu do la legxo kontrauxstaras al la promesoj de Dio? Nepre ne! cxar se estus donita legxo, kiu povus vivigi, efektive justeco estus per la legxo.
Al oírlo los suyos, salieron para apoderarse de Él, porque decían: “Ha perdido el juicio”.
Luego ¿la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera; porque si se hubiese dado una ley que pudiera vivificar, la justicia verdaderamente habría sido por la ley.
¿Luego la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera: porque si la ley dada pudiera vivificar, la justicia fuera verdaderamente por la ley.
Onko siis laki Jumalan lupauksia vastaan? Pois se! Sillä jos laki olis annettu eläväksi tekemään, niin tosin vanhurskaus tulis laista.
La loi est-elle donc contraire aux promesses de Dieu? Nullement; car s'il eût été donné une loi qui pût donner la vie, la justice viendrait véritablement de la loi.
La loi donc est-elle contraire aux promesses de Dieu? Loin de là! car s'il eût été donné une loi qui pût vivifier, la justice viendrait réellement de la loi;
La Loi donc a-t-elle été ajoutée contre les promesses de Dieu? nullement. Car si la Loi eût été donnée pour pouvoir vivifier, véritablement la justice serait de la Loi.
La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Qu’ainsi n’advienne! Car s’il avait été donné une loi qui ait le pouvoir de faire vivre, la justice serait en réalité sur le principe de [la] loi.
Ce que ses parents ayant appris, ils vinrent pour se saisir de lui, car ils disaient: " Il est hors de sens. "
तो क्या व्यवस्था परमेश्वर की प्रतिज्ञाओं के विरोध में है? कदापि न हो क्योंकि यदि ऐसी व्यवस्था दी जाती जो जीवन दे सकती, तो सचमुच धामिर्कता व्यवस्था से होती।
A törvény tehát az Isten ígéretei ellen van-é? Távol legyen! Mert ha olyan törvény adatott volna, a mely képes megeleveníteni, valóban a törvényből volna az igazság.
Kalau demikian, bertentangankah hukum Taurat dengan janji-janji Allah? Sekali-kali tidak. Sebab andaikata hukum Taurat diberikan sebagai sesuatu yang dapat menghidupkan, maka memang kebenaran berasal dari hukum Taurat."
La legge è ella dunque stata data contro alle promesse di Dio? Così non sia; perciocchè, se fosse stata data la legge, che potesse vivificare, veramente la giustizia sarebbe per la legge.
La legge è essa dunque contraria alle promesse di Dio? Così non sia; perché se fosse stata data una legge capace di produrre la vita, allora sì, la giustizia sarebbe venuta dalla legge;
그러면 율법이 하나님의 약속들을 거스리느냐 ? 결코 그럴 수 없느니라 만일 능히 살게 하는 율법을 주셨더면 의가 반드시 율법으로 말미암았으리라
그러면 율법이 하나님의 약속들을 거스리느냐 결코 그럴 수 없느니라 만일 능히 살게 하는 율법을 주셨더면 의가 반드시 율법으로 말미암았으리라
Er da loven imot Guds løfter? Langt derifra! for var det gitt nogen lov som kunde gjøre levende, da kom rettferdigheten virkelig av loven;
Er so lovi imot Guds lovnader? Langt ifrå! for var det gjeve ei lov som hadde magt til å gjera livande, so kom rettferdi verkeleg av lovi.
Zakon tedy jestże przeciwko obietnicom Bożym? Nie daj tego Boże! albowiem gdyby był dany zakon, który by mógł ożywiać, prawdziwieć by z zakonu była sprawiedliwość.
É a lei, então, contra as promessas de Deus? De modo nenhum; porque, se fosse dada uma lei que pudesse vivificar, a justiça, na verdade, teria sido pela lei.
Acaso, pois, a Lei é contra as promessas de Deus? De maneira nenhuma! Pois, se a Lei houvesse sido entregue para que pudesse dar vida, na verdade a justiça teria sido pela Lei.
Acaso, pois, a Lei é contra as promessas de Deus? De maneira nenhuma! Pois, se a Lei houvesse sido entregue para que pudesse dar vida, na verdade a justiça teria sido pela Lei.
Então, é a Lei contra as promessas de Deus? De jeito nenhum! Pois se tivesse sido dada uma lei capaz de dar vida, a justiça certamente teria vindo pela Lei.
Atunci oare Legea este împotriva făgăduinţelor lui Dumnezeu? Nicidecum! Dacă s'ar fi dat o Lege care să poată da viaţa, într'adevăr, neprihănirea ar veni din Lege.
Итак закон противен обетованиям Божиим? Никак! Ибоесли бы дан был закон, могущий животворить, то подлинно праведность была бы от закона;
Öyleyse Kutsal Yasa Tanrı'nın vaatlerine aykırı mıdır? Kesinlikle hayır! Çünkü yaşam sağlayabilen bir yasa verilseydi, elbette insanlar yasayla aklanırdı.
Vậy thì luật pháp nghịch cùng lời hứa của Ðức Chúa Trời hay sao? chẳng hề như vậy; vì nếu đã ban cho một luật pháp có thể làm cho sống, thì sự công bình chắc bởi luật pháp mà đến.
這 樣 ， 律 法 是 與 神 的 應 許 反 對 麼 ？ 斷 乎 不 是 ！ 若 曾 傳 一 個 能 叫 人 得 生 的 律 法 ， 義 就 誠 然 本 乎 律 法 了 。
律法的功用這樣，律法和 神的應許是對立的嗎？絕對不是。如果所賜下的律法能使人得生命，義就真的是出於律法了。