Comparer les Traductions

فماذا نقول. هل الناموس خطية. حاشا. بل لم اعرف الخطية الا بالناموس. فانني لم اعرف الشهوة لو لم يقل الناموس لا تشته.

Což tedy díme? Že zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, kdyby byl zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.

Hvad skulle vi da sige? er Loven Synd? Det være langt fra! Men jeg kendte ikke Synden uden ved Loven; thi jeg kendte jo ikke Begæringen, hvis ikke Loven sagde: „Du maa ikke begære.‟

Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten".

Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten".

Entsende daher jetzt einen Mann, der dein Vertrauen besitzt, daß er hingehe und sich all das Unheil ansehe, das jener über uns und das Land des Königs gebracht hat, und sie und alle ihre Helfershelfer bestrafe«.

Was wollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, außer durch das Gesetz; denn von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten!

Was wollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Nimmermehr. Aber die Sünde wäre mir nicht zur Erkenntnis gekommen, wenn nicht durch das Gesetz. Hätte ich doch auch von der Lust nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten;

Τι λοιπον θελομεν ειπει; ο νομος ειναι αμαρτια; Μη γενοιτο. Αλλα την αμαρτιαν δεν εγνωρισα, ειμη δια του νομου· διοτι και την επιθυμιαν δεν ηθελον γνωρισει, εαν ο νομος δεν ελεγε· Μη επιθυμησης.

Τι λοιπόν θέλομεν ειπεί; ο νόμος είναι αμαρτία; Μη γένοιτο. Αλλά την αμαρτίαν δεν εγνώρισα, ειμή διά του νόμου· διότι και την επιθυμίαν δεν ήθελον γνωρίσει, εάν ο νόμος δεν έλεγε· Μη επιθυμήσης.

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

What then is to be said? is the law sin? in no way. But I would not have had knowledge of sin but for the law: for I would not have been conscious of desire if the law had not said, You may not have a desire for what is another's.

Now, therefore, send a man, whom you trust, and let him go and see all the destruction he has done to us and to the regions of the king. And let him punish all his friends and their helpers.”

What shall we say then? [is] the law sin? Far be the thought. But I had not known sin, unless by law: for I had not had conscience also of lust unless the law had said, Thou shalt not lust;

Now, therefore, send some men whom thou trustest, and let him go, and see all the havoc he hath made amongst us, and in the king's lands: and let him punish all his friends and their helpers.

What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.

What shall we say then? {Is} the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. {lust: or, concupiscence}

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I would not have known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known coveting, unless the law had said, "You shall not covet."

What shall we saye then? is ye lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meant but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust.

What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? By no means. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

What, then, shall we say? the law is sin? let it not be! but the sin I did not know except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the law had not said:

Kion do ni diru? CXu la legxo estas peko? Nepre ne! Tamen mi ne konus pekon, krom per la legxo; cxar mi ne konus deziron, se la legxo ne dirus:Ne deziru;

Envía, pues, una persona de tu confianza, para que vaya y vea todos los estragos que aquel nos ha causado a nosotros y a las provincias del rey y castigue a todos sus amigos y partidarios.”

¶ ¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Antes yo no conociera al pecado, sino por la ley; porque no conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.

¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Empero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley: porque tampoco conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás.

Mitäs me siis sanomme? Onko laki synti? Pois se! Mutta en minä muutoin syntiä olisi tuntenut, ellei lain kautta; sillä en minä olisi himoistakaan mitään tiennyt, ellei laki olisi sanonut: ei sinun pidä himoitseman.

Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle la cause du péché? Nullement! Au contraire, je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi; car je n'aurai point connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.

Que dirons-nous donc? la loi est-elle péché? Non certes! Mais je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi; car aussi je n'aurais pas connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point.

Que dirons-nous donc? La Loi est-elle péché? à Dieu ne plaise! au contraire je n’ai point connu le péché, sinon par la Loi: car je n’eusse pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi n’eût dit: tu ne convoiteras point.

Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? – Qu’ainsi n’advienne! Mais je n’aurais pas connu le péché, si ce n’avait été par [la] loi; car je n’aurais pas eu conscience de la convoitise, si la loi n’avait dit: « Tu ne convoiteras point ».

N'y a-t-il pas les paroles qu'a proclamées Yahweh par l'intermédiaire des anciens prophètes, quand Jérusalem était habitée et tranquille, avec ses villes autour d'elle, et que le négéb et la sephélah étaient habités?

तो हम क्या कहें? क्या व्यवस्था पाप है? कदापि नहीं! वरन बिना व्यवस्था के मैं पाप को नहीं पहिचानता: व्यवस्था यदि न कहती, कि लालच मत कर तो मैं लालच को न जानता।

Mit mondunk tehát? A törvény bűn-é? Távol legyen: sőt inkább a bűnt nem ismertem, hanem csak a törvény által; mert a kívánságról sem tudtam volna, ha a törvény nem mondaná: Ne kívánjad.

Jika demikian, apakah yang hendak kita katakan? Apakah hukum Taurat itu dosa? Sekali-kali tidak! Sebaliknya, justru oleh hukum Taurat aku telah mengenal dosa. Karena aku juga tidak tahu apa itu keinginan, kalau hukum Taurat tidak mengatakan: "Jangan mengingini!"

Che diremo adunque? che la legge sia peccato? Così non sia; anzi, io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per la legge; perciocchè io non avrei conosciuta la concupiscenza, se la legge non dicesse: Non concupire.

Che diremo dunque? La legge è essa peccato? Così non sia; anzi io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per mezzo della legge; poiché io non avrei conosciuto la concupiscenza, se la legge non avesse detto: Non concupire.

그런즉 우리가 무슨 말 하리요 율법이 죄냐 그럴 수 없느니라 율법으로 말미암지 않고는 내가 죄를 알지 못하였니 곧 율법이 탐내지 말라 하지 아니하였더면 내가 탐심을 알지 못하였으리라

그런즉 우리가 무슨 말 하리요 율법이 죄냐 그럴 수 없느니라 율법으로 말미암지 않고는 내가 죄를 알지 못하였으니 곧 율법이 탐내지 말라 하지 아니하였더면 내가 탐심을 알지 못하였으리라

Hvad skal vi da si? er loven synd? Langt derifra! men jeg kjente ikke synden uten ved loven; for begjærligheten kjente jeg ikke dersom ikke loven hadde sagt: Du skal ikke begjære.

Kva skal me då segja? Er lovi synd? Nei, langt ifrå! men eg kjende ikkje syndi utan gjenom lovi; for eg kjende ikkje lysti, um ikkje lovi hadde sagt: «Du skal ikkje lysta!»

Cóż tedy rzeczemy? Iż zakon jest grzechem? Nie daj tego Boże! I owszemem grzechu nie poznał, tylko przez zakon; bo i o pożądliwości bym był nie wiedział, by był zakon nie rzekł: Nie będziesz pożądał.

Que diremos pois? É a lei pecado? De modo nenhum. Contudo, eu não conheci o pecado senão pela lei; porque eu não conheceria a concupiscência, se a lei não dissesse: Não cobiçarás.

Que diremos, pois? É a Lei pecado? De maneira nenhuma! Todavia, eu não teria conhecido o pecado, se não fosse pela Lei; porque não conheceria a cobiça, se a Lei não dissesse: Não cobiçarás.

Que diremos, pois? É a Lei pecado? De maneira nenhuma! Todavia, eu não teria conhecido o pecado, se não fosse pela Lei; porque não conheceria a cobiça, se a Lei não dissesse: Não cobiçarás.

O que diremos então? É a lei em si pecado? De modo algum. No entanto, eu jamais conheceria o pecado se não fosse através da lei. Por que eu não conheceria a cobiça se a lei não dissesse: "Não cobiçarás".

Deci ce vom zice? Legea este ceva păcătos? Nici de cum! Dimpotrivă, păcatul nu l-am cunoscut decît prin Lege. De pildă, n'aş fi cunoscut pofta, dacă Legea nu mi-ar fi spus: ,,Să nu pofteşti!``

Что же скажем? Неужели от закона грех? Никак. Но я не иначе узнал грех, как посредством закона. Ибо яне понимал бы и пожелания, если бы закон не говорил: не пожелай.

Öyleyse ne diyelim? Kutsal Yasa günah mı oldu? Kesinlikle hayır! Ama Yasa olmasaydı, günahın ne olduğunu bilemezdim. Yasa, “Göz dikmeyeceksin” demeseydi, başkasının malına göz dikmenin ne olduğunu bilemezdim.

Vậy chúng ta sẽ nói làm sao? Luật pháp há là tội lỗi sao? Chẳng hề như vậy! Nhưng tôi chỉ bởi luật pháp mà biết tội lỗi; vì nếu luật pháp không nói: Người chớ tham lam, thì tôi đã không biết sự tham lam.

這 樣 ， 我 們 可 說 甚 麼 呢 ？ 律 法 是 罪 麼 ？ 斷 乎 不 是 ！ 只 是 非 因 律 法 ， 我 就 不 知 何 為 罪 。 非 律 法 說 不 可 起 貪 心 ， 我 就 不 知 何 為 貪 心 。

善惡兩律在心中交戰這樣，我們可以說甚麼呢？難道律法是罪嗎？絕對不是。不過，如果不是藉著律法，我就不知道甚麼是罪；如果不是律法說“不可貪心”，我就不知道甚麼是貪心。